ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025
Incidence and Timing of Foot Injury Diagnosis in Polytrauma Patients: A Retrospective Registry-Based Study.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Foot injuries are often missed in polytrauma patients, as more severe injuries may overshadow them, leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of foot injuries in polytrauma patients, evaluate the timing of their diagnosis, and identify risk factors associated with delayed diagnosis. Methods: In this retrospective registry-based study, all polytrauma patients with a New Injury Severity Score of ≥16 treated at Tampere University Hospital (TAUH) from 2016 to 2023 were screened for foot fractures as well as Lisfranc and Chopart injuries. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and timing of diagnosis were extracted from TAUH's trauma registry and analyzed. Results: Out of 1327 polytrauma patients, 54 (4.1%) sustained foot injuries, totalling 215 foot injuries (195 fractures). Delayed diagnosis, defined as >24 hours between trauma and diagnosis, occurred in 23 patients (43%), involving 80 injuries (37%). Fractures of the midfoot and metatarsus were most commonly diagnosed with delay. Delayed diagnosis was significantly more common in patients with a higher number of foot fractures and injuries ( Conclusion: A substantial portion of polytrauma patients had foot injuries that were diagnosed >24 hours after the time of trauma. Despite these delays, most injuries were minor and without notable clinical consequences. Current tertiary survey protocols effectively detect most major foot injuries requiring immediate attention. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective registry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.