ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Intradiscal Biacuplasty Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: Long-Term Results of More Than 100 Patients.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Intradiscal biacuplasty (IDB) has emerged as an effective treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD), yet long-term outcomes and decisive prognostic factors remain underexplored. This study enrolled over 100 patients with symptoms for as long as two years to examine clinical efficacy and radiological predictors of surgical success. Methods: A neurosurgeon conducted a prospective study on 117 patients who underwent IDB at a single medical center. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria at multiple time points up to two years postoperatively. Preoperative MRI scans were evaluated for disc morphology, degeneration severity, and facet joint pathology. Statistical analyses were performed to identify factors associated with clinical outcomes, satisfaction, and the need for secondary interventions. Results: Significant reductions in VAS and ODI scores were observed from one week postoperatively and sustained over two years (ΔVAS: 95% Cl = 3.81 Conclusion: IDB is an effective and durable treatment for selected patients with lumbar DDD, especially those with disc extrusion and limited facet joint degeneration. These findings underscore the importance of careful patient selection and radiological assessment in optimizing IDB outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.