ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Radiographic and histomorphometric evaluation of Autogenous Particulated Dentin for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The present systematic review aimed to identify and summarize the radiographic and histological outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) using autogenous particulate dentin (APD) compared with spontaneous healing (SH) or other materials in alveolus post-extraction. Material and Methods: The protocol of this PRISMA systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021245740). Clinical trials (CT) fulfilling specific eligibility criteria were included. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers. Study results were summarized using random effect metanalyses to synthesize the findings of the trials. Results: Fourteen articles concerning ten Randomized CT were included, involving a total of 304 participants, reporting data from 458 sockets. Most of the studies were considered as "unclear" risk of bias. Metanalyses indicated less horizontal at coronal third (difference in weighted means (WMD) = 2.04 mm; p<0.001) and middle third (WMD = 1.52 mm; p=0.002) bone resorption in ARP with APD compared to spontaneous healing assessed radiographically. However, no statistical significance was reached in the apical third (WMD = 0.33 mm; p=0.435) or in the vertical dimensional changes (at buccal aspect, WMD = 0.19 mm; p=0.789; and at lingual aspect, WMD = 0.44 mm; p=0.271). It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis for histomorphometric. Conclusions: ARP with APD is an effective therapy to attenuate post-extraction bone resorption and ridge changes, especially in the coronal width of the socket.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.