ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
A Novel Ultrasound Assessment Technique of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament to Account for the Valgus Stress Effect of Gravity on the Medial Elbow.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the elbow is commonly injured in baseball athletes. When assessed in the supine abducted and externally rotated (ABER) position using stress ultrasonography (sUS), even before applying a valgus load, gravity pulls on the forearm, creating an initial valgus load that may distort the resting joint space measurement. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to measure the valgus stress effect of gravity on the resting joint space and determine if a varus-stressed joint space provides a better baseline measurement. It was hypothesized that there would be a greater resting joint space in the throwing arm in the ABER position as a result of UCL laxity but no difference in joint space under varus stress compared to the nonthrowing arm. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Bilateral elbows of asymptomatic male collegiate baseball players with no history of elbow injury were evaluated via sUS. Ulnohumeral joint space was measured at rest (gravity stress), under varus stress, and under manually applied valgus stress. Joint gap differences from rest to varus, rest to valgus, and varus to valgus were compared between throwing and nonthrowing arms. We also examined joint space measurements in throwing arms with and without ultrasonography-identified UCL abnormalities. Results: A total of 50 athletes were included. Compared to nonthrowing arms, throwing arms had greater resting (3.4 ± 0.6 mm vs 2.9 ± 0.6 mm) and valgus-stressed (3.8 ± 0.7 mm vs 3.4 ± 0.6 mm) joint spaces, but the varus-stressed joint space did not differ between sides. Varus-to-valgus joint gap was significantly greater in throwing arms (1.3 ± 0.5 mm) versus nonthrowing arms (1.0 ± 0.4 mm), while rest-to-valgus differences were not significant. Valgus stress joint space (4.1 ± 0.7 mm vs 3.7 ± 0.7 mm, Conclusion: Asymptomatic male collegiate baseball players' throwing arm had a significantly greater resting joint space when exposed to gravity stress than the nonthrowing arm in the ABER position, possibly as a result of adaptive UCL laxity. However, the bilateral similarity in varus-stressed measurements suggests it may serve as a better baseline for sUS assessments. Future research incorporating varus stress as a baseline in symptomatic athletes may improve the accuracy and clinical relevance of medial elbow laxity evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.