ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Micro/Nanorobots in Wound Healing: Bridging the Gap from Concept to Clinical Translation.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Silica based nanocarriers for combination immunotherapy targeting the tumor immune microenvironment.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction as a Driver of Neurodegeneration in Parkinson's and Huntington's Disease: Molecular Insights and Emerging Interventions.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Approaching Scarless Wound Healing: From Passive Anti-Fibrotic to Proactive and Programmable Pro-Regenerative Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Engineered exosomes for targeted bone regeneration: design, delivery, and functionalization.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Review
- Advances and Challenges in the Comprehensive Management of Diabetic Foot: A Narrative Review from a General Practice Perspective.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2026Review
- Biofilm-Responsive Nanoplatforms for Infected Wound Reconstruction.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic wounds, such as diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, and pressure sores, pose a significant clinical challenge due to ongoing inflammation, biofilm development, and impaired tissue regeneration. Standard wound care methods often fail to address these complex barriers, highlighting the need for innovative solutions. Nanorobotics has emerged as a groundbreaking platform, enabling programmable, multifunctional systems capable of active navigation, biofilm penetration, modulation of the microenvironment, and targeted therapeutic delivery. This review systematically covers the design principles and functional components of micro-/nanorobots, including propulsion techniques, sensing and actuation mechanisms, and biomimetic surface modifications. We also examine their therapeutic potential in wound healing, focusing on drug delivery optimization, biofilm disruption, reduction of oxidative stress, immune regulation, and tissue regeneration support. The integration of nanorobotics with intelligent wound care systems offers real-time monitoring and closed-loop interventions, initiating a new era of "smart wound management." Finally, we address translational challenges such as biosafety, large-scale manufacturing, and regulatory pathways, and provide perspectives on future advancements toward clinically practical, intelligent nanorobotic wound therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.