ArticleJTCVS open2025
Neighborhood socioeconomic status predicts long-term outcomes after acute type A aortic dissection repair in a propensity-matched cohort.
Article in JTCVS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in Outcomes After Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: An Analysis of the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit Registry.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Sociodemographic Determinants of Timely Hip Dysplasia Ultrasound Screening.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on early and long-term outcomes after major aortic surgery: insights from a 20-year single-centre cohort.Open heart · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Socioeconomic status is associated with outcomes after various cardiac surgical procedures, including repair of acute type A aortic dissection; however, existing data are limited to short-term follow-up and incomplete markers of disparity. We sought to apply a comprehensive, validated score of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status to explore the impact of resource deprivation on long-term outcomes of patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection repair. Methods: A retrospective review of our institution's database of type A aortic dissections was conducted to identify patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection repair from 1993 to 2022. Socioeconomic status was quantified using the Area Deprivation Index, a weighted score that incorporates 17 markers of disparities to determine overall deprivation at the neighborhood block level. Patients were divided into 4 quartiles based on Area Deprivation Index, with Q1 representing the most deprived and Q4 representing the least deprived. Fifteen-year survival was compared between the first and fourth quartiles in a propensity-matched survival analysis and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Of 1199 patients with addresses available for Area Deprivation Index linking who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair, 294 patients were in Q1 and 306 patients were in Q4. Patients in the lowest quartile were younger, more likely to be female, and less likely to be White. After propensity matching, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significantly reduced 15-year survival among patients in Q1 ( Conclusions: Socioeconomic status is associated with long-term mortality after acute type A aortic dissection repair, despite no difference in initial presentation or early postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.