ReviewTherapeutic advances in rare disease
Lysosomal storage diseases in North America: a comprehensive review of enzyme therapies and unmet needs.
Review in Therapeutic advances in rare disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review explores enzyme replacement therapies (ERTs) for lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs), focusing on disease characteristics, mechanisms of action, clinical benefits, limitations, and implications for patient care and access. LSDs are a group of over 50 rare, inherited metabolic disorders caused by mutations affecting lysosomal enzymes, membrane proteins, or transporters. This leads to the accumulation of undegraded macromolecules in tissues such as the CNS (central nervous system), heart, and muscles, resulting in progressive dysfunction and possible death. ERTs, approved by FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) and the EMA (European Medicines Agency), have been the cornerstone of treatment since 1995, significantly improving the patient's quality of life reducing organ damage and stabilizing cardiac and renal function. However, ERTs require lifelong intravenous infusions and have limited efficacy to treat CNS symptoms due to their inability to cross the BBB (blood-brain barrier). Some patients develop immune responses known as ADA (anti-drug antibody), which can compromise treatment effectiveness. Emerging research into nanotechnology and combination therapies may help overcome these limitations. Newer formulations such as pegunigalsidase (Elfabrio®) use for FD (Fabry disease), exhibit lower affinity for developing ADA compared to other ERTs, offer reduced immunogenicity and safety profiles enhancement. Cost remains a major barrier, with annual treatment expenses often exceeding hundreds of thousands of dollars. Access to ERT is uneven, particularly in underfunded healthcare systems. In North America, reimbursement varies by region and payer, potentially delaying treatment and impacting outcomes. This review draws from MEDLINE, Cochrane Reviews, and PubMed (1984-2025) using search terms such as LSDs, ERTs, rare diseases, Gaucher disease, Fabry disease, and others. Ongoing research and health policy reforms are essential to improve access, equity, and therapeutic outcomes for patients with LSDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.