Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466699›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Clinical outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Rohit Dubey, Ambuj Kumar Soni, Vinit Kumar Tiwari, Rajkishor Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rohit DubeyDepartment of Surgery, Government Medical College, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ambuj Kumar SoniDepartment of Surgery, Birsa Munda Government Medical College, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Vinit Kumar TiwariDepartment of Surgery, Government Medical College, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rajkishor SinghDepartment of Surgery, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Government Medical College, Vidisha, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The best surgical approach for early-stage breast cancer is still under debate, particularly in the context of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. A retrospective cohort study of 132 patients treated with BCS or mastectomy over 5 years of follow-up compared outcomes related to overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence, and complications. Outcomes were similar in each group but higher recurrence was associated with BCS and better cosmetic and psychological outcomes. Mastectomy had lower recurrence but additional morbidity associated with treatment. These findings are an important step in advocating for shared decision-making with individualized treatment options.

Indexed as

Breast-conserving surgeryearly-stage breast cancermastectomyrecurrence ratessurvival outcomes

Identifiers

PMID41466699
PMCPMC12744472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.