Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466690›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

CBCT for accurate diagnosis of oral lesions: Comparison with biopsy and imaging.

Mansha Zarabi, Gagandeep Gupta, Vikram Bali, Rajneesh Parimoo, Tanya Goyal, Shivangi Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mansha ZarabiDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Desh Bhagat Dental College and Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India.
Gagandeep GuptaDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Desh Bhagat Dental College and Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India.
Vikram BaliDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Desh Bhagat Dental College and Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India.
Rajneesh ParimooDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Desh Bhagat Dental College and Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India.
Tanya GoyalDepartment of Paediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Desh Bhagat Dental College and Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India.
Shivangi GuptaDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Desh Bhagat Dental College and Hospital, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing oral lesions accurately is challenging because conventional methods like biopsy, while reliable, are invasive, time-consuming, and may cause discomfort or complications. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the results of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with biopsy results to assess the accuracy of CBCT in locating oral lesions. This study consisted of two groups of participants, totaling 108 individuals. Group A consisted of participants who underwent biopsy and the other group underwent imaging using CBCT. Data shows that CBCT was better at detecting abnormalities. Thus, we show that CBCT is a safe and reliable approach for checking bone involvement, malignancies, and soft tissue expansion.

Indexed as

BiopsyCBCTDiagnostic accuracyOral lesionsSensitivity

Identifiers

PMID41466690
PMCPMC12744464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.