Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466688›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Parthivi Singh, Anupama Ahirwar, Ananya Bhargava, Apoorva Sharma, Subasish Behera, Soumyaranjan Nanda, Miral Mehta, Dhirendra Kumar Singh

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Parthivi SinghDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peoples Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Anupama AhirwarDepartment of Dentistry, Sunderlal Patwa Government Medical College, Mandsaur, Mathya Pradesh India.
Ananya BhargavaConsultant Orthodontist, Avanti Hospital, Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Apoorva SharmaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Triveni Institute of Dental Sciences, Hospital & Research Centre, Bodri, Chhattisgarh, India.
Subasish BeheraDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital (SCB), Manglabag, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Soumyaranjan NandaEndodontics, Private Practitioner, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
Miral MehtaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Dhirendra Kumar SinghDepartment of Periodontology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shear bond strength (SBS) between enhanced Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (e-MTA) and glass ionomer cement (GIC) under different placement intervals is of interest. Sixty acrylic blocks filled with e-MTA were restored with GIC at 0 min, 15 min and 24 h. The highest SBS (12.47 ± 1.29 MPa) was observed at the 15-minute interval. Predominantly mixed failures were seen in Groups II and III, while cohesive failures occurred in Group I. Applying GIC 15 minutes after e-MTA yields optimal bonding for durable restorations.

Indexed as

adhesion timingendodontic restorationglass ionomer cementMineral trioxide aggregateshear bond strength

Identifiers

PMID41466688
PMCPMC12744433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.