ArticleBioinformation2025
Determination of safe zone for median nerve in carpal tunnel using anatomical landmarks.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carpal tunnel release, though common, carries a risk of iatrogenic median nerve injury, making it important to determine its safe zone within the tunnel using consistent palpable. In this study, 40 formalin-fixed upper limbs were dissected, and distances from the radial styloid process (RSP), palmaris longus tendon (PLT), and the medial-most point of the lower end of the ulna (LBU) to the median nerve (MN) were measured. The MN was consistently medial to the PLT and deep to the flexor retinaculum, with a mean RSP-MN distance of 28.48 mm, showing significant side differences (p = 0.001). A positive correlation between RSP-PLT and RSP-MN distances (r = 0.410, p = 0.016) confirmed the PLT as a useful landmark, while RSP and LBU served as reliable alternatives when PLT was absent. Thus, we show the clinical value of these anatomical landmarks in minimizing nerve injury during carpal tunnel procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.