ArticleBioinformation2025
Effect of surface treatment on tensile bond strength between polyvinyl siloxane and custom trays: An
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental impressions are important for prosthodontics as they impact the quality of the final prosthesis with accuracy and fit. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the tensile bond strength of polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression material with two different custom tray materials, visible light-cured (VLC) resin and 3D-printed custom trays, with and without sandblasting. A total of 80 custom trays (40 VLC resin and 40 3D-printed) were constructed. The 80 trays were divided into sandblasted and non-sandblasted subgroups and tensile bond strength testing was performed on each using a Universal Testing Machine. Testing revealed that sandblasted VLC trays had much higher bond strength than sandblasted 3D-printed custom trays, while the non-sandblasted 3D-printed custom trays had greater bond strength than non-sandblasted VLC trays. Thus, we show an emphasis on the need for surface treatment and being selective when choosing a material when developing a custom tray to be used with an elastomeric impression material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.