ArticleBioinformation2025
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surface modifications and implant thread designs play a crucial role in achieving primary stability and osseointegration. Therefore, it is of interest to compare the short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of active versus self-tapping titanium implants with sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaces in 20 systemically healthy patients requiring posterior implant-supported prostheses. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed at 4, 7, 12 and 26 weeks and statistical analysis showed significant intra-group improvements in probing depth, attachment levels, mucosal margin stability and bone gain. However, intergroup comparisons at all-time points revealed no statistically significant differences, indicating comparable performance between the two implant designs. Overall, both active and self-threaded SLA implants demonstrated favorable short-term clinical outcomes, supporting their effectiveness in promoting early osseointegration and potential use in early loading protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.