Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466623›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Digital impression making in dentistry: A review.

Anjali Sharma, Ameer Akhil Ahmed Shaik, Sumit Bhatt, Aishwarya Handa, Sonali Perti, Deepashree C, Pratik Surana

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anjali SharmaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Teerthanker Mahaveer Dental College & Research Centre, TMU, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ameer Akhil Ahmed ShaikDepartment of Dental Surgery and General Dentistry, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, India.
Sumit BhattDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rajasthan Dental College & Hospital, Nirwan University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Aishwarya HandaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sonali PertiDepartment of Prosthodontics, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT University, Campus 15, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Deepashree CDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, V S Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pratik SuranaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adoption and impact of digital impression-making in dentistry is of interest. It highlights key benefits such as enhanced accuracy, reduced patient discomfort, faster restoration times and improved collaboration among dental professionals. Thus, data shows the transformative role of digital technology in enhancing patient care and dental practice efficiency.

Indexed as

conventional impressiondentistryDigital impression

Identifiers

PMID41466623
PMCPMC12744468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.