ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Inequalities in all-cause mortality by ethnicity in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethnic differences in Long COVID diagnosed in primary care in England (2020-2022): an observational cohort study using OpenSAFELY.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Ethnic inequalities in all-cause mortality in the UK: the importance of evidence in shaping health policy.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ethnic inequalities in health outcomes are a persistent concern in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to quantify ethnic differences in all-cause mortality across the UK and explore the potential modifying roles of socioeconomic position (SEP) and country of birth. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to April 20, 2024, and identified grey literature via EThOS, ProQuest, Google, and data-sharing platforms. Eligible studies reported all-cause mortality by ethnicity or other commonly used measures such as country of birth or person or parents and surname in UK populations. Two reviewers independently conducted screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the ROBINS-E tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019146143). Findings: Of 7672 records screened, 32 studies met inclusion criteria, supplemented by unpublished data from three cohort studies. Age-adjusted all-cause mortality was consistently lower among females of Bangladeshi (Relative Risk = 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.95), Indian (0.78, 0.68-0.88), Pakistani (0.85, 0.79-0.91), Black Caribbean (0.83, 0.81-0.85), Chinese (0.64, 0.61-0.69), and Mixed ethnicity (0.94, 0.90-0.98), and among males of Bangladeshi (0.89, 0.86-0.93), Indian (0.78, 0.69-0.88), Pakistani (0.76, 0.69-0.83), Black Caribbean (0.89, 0.85-0.93), and Chinese ethnicity (0.66, 0.50-0.87)), compared with White British individuals. In contrast, White Irish (1.20, 1.06-1.34) and White Scottish males (1.19, 1.11-1.27), and White Scottish females (1.18, 1.08-1.29), had higher mortality than other White British. Evidence on the role of SEP was inconclusive due to methodological heterogeneity. Evidence on the role of country of birth was also limited with wide and overlapping confidence intervals around the results stratified by country of birth (UK-born vs non-UK-born) in each ethnic group. However, the UK-born Black Caribbean population had higher relative mortality rate compared to the UK-born White British population (1.49; 0.98-2.28), although this did not quite reach statistical significance. Interpretation: Inequalities in mortality by ethnic group were consistent and substantial. The contribution of SEP to observed inequalities is complex and the quality of evidence is impacted by methodological heterogeneity. However, SEP disadvantage is unlikely to explain the lower relative mortality of non-white groups. The potential for inequalities within ethnic groups by country of birth has important policy implications, as this suggests the need to tailor public health strategies within ethnic groups by country of birth. However, more evidence is needed for most ethnic groups. As a result, we call for greater reporting of both ethnicity and country of birth in ethnic inequalities research in the UK. Funding: Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (Grant ID: CE170100PRO005).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.