ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Post-COVID-19 condition in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 in autumn 2023 in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study with pre- and post-infection data.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persistent fatigue in long-COVID is not associated with peripheral inflammatory or cellular stress biomarkers: A cross-sectional controlled study.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of seasonal mRNA COVID-19 vaccination against post COVID-19 condition between July 2023 and September 2024 among adults aged ≥ 60 years in Germany: a population-based cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) in Hospitalized and Ambulatory Patients: A Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Potential Public Health and Economic Impact of the Next-Generation COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA-1283 in The Netherlands.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) risk may have changed due to vaccination status, virus variants, prior infections, and other factors. We aimed to estimate PCC prevalence for one year in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during autumn 2023, controlling for pre-infection symptoms and prevalence in recently uninfected participants. Methods: VASCO, a Dutch ongoing prospective cohort, collects three-monthly questionnaires and six-monthly SARS-CoV-2 serology. Participants indicated severity of 23 symptoms on a five-point Likert scale, and of fatigue and concentration problems on the Checklist Individual Strength. We matched participants who did with those who did not report a SARS-CoV-2 infection between September 25, 2023 and January 7, 2024, and censored follow-up time for both upon serological or antigen test evidence of infection. We estimated PCC-prevalence as the excess prevalence of at least one PCC-related symptom between matched infected and uninfected participants at 90, 180, 270, and 360 days post-infection. Additionally, participants could self-attribute long-term symptoms to SARS-CoV-2. Findings: We 1:1 matched 5621 infected to 5621 uninfected participants. The PCC prevalence, estimated as the marginal mean excess prevalence of PCC-related symptoms between infected and uninfected participants, was 0.2% (95% confidence interval: -1.9 to 2.3, p = 0.84) at 90 days, 0.5% (-1.6 to 2.6, p = 0.63) at 180 days, 0.7% (-1.3 to 2.8, p = 0.48) at 270 days, and 0.0% (-2.1 to 2.1, p = 0.99) at 360 days. Excess prevalence of new mild and severe long-term symptoms self-attributed to SARS-CoV-2 between infected and uninfected participants were both elevated at 90 days (mild: 7.2% (5.1-9.2), severe: 0.6% (0.4-0.8)) and 180 days (mild: 3.2% (2.0-4.4), severe: 0.3% (0.2-0.4)) post-infection (all p-values <0.0001), but no longer thereafter. Interpretation: This double-controlled study, incorporating pre- versus post-infection and uninfected symptom data, found a low risk of PCC among a community-dwelling adult population infected during the autumn 2023 SARS-CoV-2 wave. The prevalence of PCC-related symptoms in infected and uninfected individuals was not significantly different at 90-360 days post-infection. The excess prevalences of self-attributed long-term symptoms were elevated at 90 and 180 days post-infection but no longer from 270 days onwards. These findings suggest that the 2023 wave inferred a lower PCC risk than during the pandemic period. Funding: Funded by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.