ArticleNursing open2026
Experiences of Nursing Students With NANDA-I Documentation at a Public University in Nigeria.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe study explored the lived experiences in the utilisation of NANDA International Inc. (NANDA-I) classification in the documentation of nursing care among nursing students in a selected Public University.
designA qualitative phenomenological approach was adopted, guided by a constructivist paradigm and Benner's Novice to Expert theory.
methodsQualitative approach was explored in this study. The second to fifth year nursing students, of similar age groups, and ward postings were included in the study. Those on part-time and first year nursing students were excluded. This was done in one phase with the use of a focus group discussion guide (FGDs). Participants were engaged in FGDs. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical review committee, and informed consent was taken from the participants. Data were collected for 2 months and analysed using themes with independent coding by multiple researchers to ensure inter-coder reliability. The Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research "COREQ" was used.
resultsThe study involved 20 participants, 15 of whom were female, with a mean age of 23 years (±2.0). Two (2) themes with various subthemes were extracted showing participants' lived experiences. These include (i) personal reflections, subthemes (Universality, Completeness, Uniformity, Decision making, and accurate documentation). (ii) Difficulty domain, subthemes (Comprehending terminologies and concepts, prioritising diagnoses, keeping up with updates and revisions of NANDA-I, and selecting appropriate 'related factor'). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Nursing students and nurses increase usage of the NANDA-I diagnoses, improve coordinated patient care, and should result in better quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.