SynthesisJournal of periodontology2026
Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence-based deep learning models in detecting furcation involvement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of periodontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFurcation involvement complicates the management of periodontitis and increases the risk of tooth loss. Conventional methods of detection, such as probing and two-dimensional radiographs, are limited by operator variability and anatomical complexity. Deep learning has shown a potential to detect furcation involvement on radiographic images. The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic potentials of deep learning models in detecting furcation involvement on radiographic images.
methodsSystematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ProQuest for studies published from 2010 to September 2025. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality using QUADAS-2. Diagnostic metrics (sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, area under the curve (AUC)) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed via I
resultsEight studies, including 7814 radiographs of 12,373 molars (periapical, panoramic, cone-beam computed tomography), were analyzed. Deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy: sensitivity 0.93, specificity 0.94, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 187, AUC 0.97 with mandibular molars reflecting higher accuracy (sensitivity 0.96, specificity 0.97, DOR 631, AUC 0.99). Fagan plot analysis indicated strong clinical utility. Meta-regression showed no significant effect of dataset type, augmentation, or number of annotators. No publication bias was detected.
conclusionDeep learning models show promising accuracy in detecting furcation involvement, particularly in mandibular molars, comparable to expert clinicians. Further refinement with larger, diverse datasets is needed to reduce false positives and enable safe clinical integration. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Furcation involvement, a condition where the bone between the roots of a tooth is lost, makes managing gum disease more difficult and increases the risk of tooth loss. Clinical probing remains a reliable and essential method for detecting this condition, while dental X-rays can provide complementary information, particularly in complex cases. This study reviewed the use of deep learning, a type of artificial intelligence (AI), to detect furcation involvement on dental X-rays. Data from eight studies, including more than 7,800 dental radiographs of >12,000 molars, were analyzed and the results showed that deep learning models were highly accurate, performing similarly to expert dentists. Accuracy was slightly higher for lower jaw (mandibular) molars. The study suggests that these AI tools could help dentists detect furcation involvement more reliably. However, more research with larger and more diverse datasets is needed before these tools can be safely used in everyday dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.