SynthesisEndocrinology, diabetes & metabolism2026
Comparative Analysis of Glucagon Receptor Agonists vs. Resmetirom in MASLD and MASH: Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Synthesis in Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative Analysis of Glucagon Receptor Agonists vs. Resmetirom in MASLD and MASH: Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMASLD and its progressive form MASH represent a global public health challenge due to their rising prevalence and their possible progression to cirrhosis and HCC. Resmetirom, dual (e.g., cotadutide, survodutide), and triple GRAs (e.g., retarutide) have demonstrated potential efficacy in recent clinical trials. This network meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of these treatments.
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central for randomised controlled trials evaluating these medications versus placebo in adults with MASLD and MASH. The outcomes assessed included changes in ALT, AST, LDL, and HDL levels, changes in MRI-PDFF, safety outcomes (diarrhoea, fatigue, and nausea), serious adverse events, ELF, adiponectin, and MASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. Random-effects model and network meta-analysis methods were employed.
resultsSix trials met the inclusion criteria. GRAs significantly reduced ALT levels with MD of -22.10, while resmetirom demonstrated the greatest reduction in AST levels with a MD of -13.17. Resmetirom also led to a borderline significant increase in HDL with the most significant reduction in LDL levels. Moreover, GRAs showed a significant effect on MRI-PDFF with a MD of -46.09. Overall, resmetirom showed a more favourable safety profile. In addition, GRAs significantly decreased ELF scores, resmetirom significantly improved MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis, and both treatments significantly increased adiponectin.
conclusionGRAs superiorly reduce ALT levels, MRI-PDFF, and ELF. Resmetirom significantly reduces AST, HDL, and LDL levels, increases MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis, and offers a more favourable safety profile. Both GRAs and resmetirom significantly increase adiponectin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.