ArticleBMC cancer2025
Alternative splicing patterns in genetic subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease with distinct genetic subtypes, each exhibiting unique molecular characteristics. Alternative splicing (AS) plays a critical role in hematologic malignancies, but its role in DLBCL progression remains less understood. Recent studies have focused extensively on genetic variants, but systematic exploration of AS in DLBCL is limited.
methodsWe analyzed whole-exome and RNA sequencing data from 620 DLBCL patient samples obtained from the European Genome-phenome Archive. RNA-seq data were aligned using STAR and quantified with RSEM to calculate TPM-normalized expression values. Subtype classification was performed using the LymphGen framework, integrating somatic variants identified with GATK Mutect2, annotated with Annovar, and copy number variations, as well as BCL2 and BCL6 fusion events detected using Arriba and validated with FISH. Alternative splicing events were identified with rMATS, and isoform-level differences were analyzed using DRIMSeq. Splicing-related pathway activity was assessed using MSigDB gene sets, and splicing factor expression was evaluated across subtypes.
resultsThe BN2 and MCD subtypes demonstrated higher activity in AS-related pathways, including spliceosome assembly and mRNA splice site recognition, accompanied by a significant increase in non-canonical isoforms. In the BN2 subtype, differential splicing was observed, especially in genes like ACTG1, RPLP0, CD74, and ACTB. These genes showed significant changes in their isoforms, suggesting that alternative splicing may play a role in driving the aggressive behavior associated with this subtype. Notably, these genes include essential housekeeping components, suggesting that targeting their splicing variants could disrupt critical cellular processes in cancer cells while sparing normal tissues. In addition, splicing factor analysis identified RBM39 as significantly downregulated in MCD, suggesting its role in aberrant splicing regulation. RBM39, an RNA-binding protein involved in the regulation of splicing, may contribute to DLBCL pathogenesis through its reduced expression, potentially leading to abnormal splicing patterns that promote malignancy in the MCD subtype.
conclusionsIntegrated analysis using rMATS and DRIMSeq consistently identified subtype-specific AS patterns, consolidating our findings. Future research should focus on validating the functional impact of these splicing alterations and assessing their potential as biomarkers for more tailored therapeutic approaches in DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.