ArticleTrials2025
Duramesh™ versus conventional suture for prevention of trocar-site hernia following laparoscopic surgery (TROCAR): study protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for the mesh matters project: evaluating the efficacy of suture mesh vs. planar mesh in small ventral hernia repair - a randomized, blinded multicenter study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Trial
- Early outcomes following Duramesh™ implantation for abdominal wall closure: the Croydon experience.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrocar-site hernia is an underappreciated condition with estimates of approximately 25% at 2 years follow-up. Duramesh™ has emerged as a novel product with potential benefits for incisional hernia prevention. The aim of this trial is to establish if Duramesh is superior to conventional suture for prevention of periumbilical trocar-site hernia following laparoscopic surgery.
methodsThe TROCAR trial is a prospective single-centre, parallel arm, double-blind randomised controlled trial conducted in the United Kingdom. A total of 250 randomised participants (1:1 ratio) will be allocated to receive either Duramesh or conventional suture (J-vicryl or J-PDS). The primary outcome is the cumulative incidence of sonographically detected periumbilical trocar-site hernia at 2 years of the index operation. Secondary outcomes are 90-day surgical site occurrence (SSO), 90-day surgical site infection (SSI), 90-day rate of reoperation, 90-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and quality of life at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years measured using a modified EuraHS-QoL score and modified Carolinas Comfort Scale.
conclusionTROCAR will provide level 1 evidence on trocar-site hernia prevention in both the emergency and elective settings.
trial registrationRegistration number ISRCTN14473961 ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14473961 ). Registered on 14th April 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.