ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Alström syndrome: a cross-sectional and follow-up study of 127 patients in China, highlighting genetic variant spectrum and cardiac features.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and Clinical Relevance of Alström Syndrome Protein 1 Gene Variant and Feline Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Sphynx Cats in Thailand.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Knowledge mapping of alström syndrome research: a bibliometric and visualization analysis based on WoS data from 2000 to 2025.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlström syndrome (ALMS) is a rare autosomal recessive multisystem disorder caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in the ALMS1 gene, characterized by progressive cone-rod dystrophy, early-onset obesity, cardiomyopathy, and multiorgan dysfunction. Despite its clinical significance, comprehensive and population-based studies of ALMS remain limited worldwide, particularly in Asian populations.
methodsThis cross-sectional and follow-up study enrolled 127 genetically confirmed Chinese ALMS patients (aged 1.0-35.1 years). Whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified ALMS1 variants, and echocardiography evaluated cardiac phenotypes. Retrospective analysis tracked LVEF changes in 11 infantile cardiomyopathy cases.
resultsA total of 132 distinct ALMS1 variants (254 alleles) were identified, including 64 novel variants. Truncating mutations predominated (nonsense: 46.9%, frameshift: 45.3%), with recurrent variants c.10,825 C > T (7.9%), c.2090 C > A (5.5%), and c.10831_10832delAG (4.7%). Clinical manifestations included universal visual impairment (100%, 112/112), obesity (84.1%, 96/114), hearing loss (70.8%, 51/72), hepatic steatosis (66.7%, 40/60), and cardiac abnormalities (58.2%, 46/79). Echocardiographic analysis of 34 patients revealed exon 16 truncating variants were significantly associated with infantile-onset cardiomyopathy (72.7% vs. 30.4%, p < 0.05). In 11 infantile cardiomyopathy cases, LVEF improved post-treatment, yet progressive cardiac enlargement persisted.
conclusionThis study provides the most comprehensive clinical and genetic characterization of Alström syndrome in a Chinese cohort to date, identifying 64 novel ALMS1 variants and expanding the known mutational spectrum of this rare disorder. The findings reveal the multisystem nature of ALMS, with frequent metabolic, hepatic, and cardiac involvement, and emphasize the importance of early recognition, multidisciplinary monitoring, and lifelong management. Together, these results establish an evidence-based foundation for improving genetic counseling, guiding precision diagnosis, and informing future mechanistic and therapeutic research on ALMS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.