Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466411›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2025

Exploring the acceptability and impact of group antenatal care: a qualitative study among women in selected health facilities in Burkina Faso.

Blami Dao, Yvette Ouedraogo, Maxwell Mhlanga, Andre Kone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Blami DaoCentre of Gender Equity, University of Global Health Equity, City of Kigali, Rwanda.
Yvette OuedraogoCentre of Gender Equity, University of Global Health Equity, City of Kigali, Rwanda.
Maxwell MhlangaCentre of Gender Equity, University of Global Health Equity, City of Kigali, Rwanda. mmhlanga@ughe.org.
Andre KoneJhpiego Burkina Faso, City of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antenatal Care (ANC) models have evolved to increase maternal and child health service utilization, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Recently, group antenatal care (G-ANC), where cohorts of pregnant women with similar gestational ages are followed throughout pregnancy, has shown promise in enhancing care utilization, patient satisfaction, and reducing maternal morbidity and mortality. However, the acceptability of G-ANC in Burkina Faso has not been assessed.This qualitative study aimed to evaluate the acceptability of G-ANC by pregnant women at six pilot sites in Burkina Faso and identify challenges for scaling up. We conducted six Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with 58 women who attended at least one G-ANC session. Participants were selected through purposive sampling, and discussions were conducted using semi-structured interview guides. Thematic analysis was performed using N-VIVO software.Six themes emerged: overall experience, benefits and challenges of G-ANC, relationships with healthcare workers and partners, changes introduced by G-ANC, and suggestions for improvement. Women expressed high satisfaction with G-ANC, citing skill development and improved relationships as key benefits. Challenges included long session durations and inadequate space. A major recommendation was to hold sessions on weekends to allow partner participation. In conclusion, G-ANC is highly accepted by women in Burkina Faso. This low-cost, high-impact initiative holds potential for broader implementation in similar settings.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePregnant PeoplePrenatal CareAdultBurkina FasoFemaleFocus GroupsHealth FacilitiesHumansMaternal Health ServicesPatient SatisfactionPregnancyQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAcceptabilityBenefitsChallengesGroup antenatal care

Identifiers

PMID41466411
PMCPMC12751604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.