Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466406›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Prediction of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in elderly cardiac surgery patients via machine learning: model development with the MIMIC-IV and external validation.

Yi Cheng, Leqi Li, Jiang Zhang, Jifang Zhou, Lihai Chen, Hongwei Shi, Yun Wang, Wei He, Fan Yang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05855954 (Application of Controlled Low Central Venous Pressure Technique in Early Intervention of Cardiac Surgery-associated Acute Kidney Injury), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05855954 narecruitingnot on this map

Application of Controlled Low Central Venous Pressure Technique in Early Intervention of Cardiac Surgery-associated Acute Kidney Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorNanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsAcute Kidney InjuryArmscontrolled low central venous pressure technique (CLCVP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yi Cheng *School of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Leqi Li *School of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Jiang Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jifang ZhouSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Lihai ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hongwei ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yun WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. wangyun7479@163.com.
Wei HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. 450239619@qq.com.
Fan YangSchool of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China. yf@cpu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative acquired pressure injury (IAPI) represents a major risk in elderly cardiac surgery patients due to skin fragility and impaired perfusion. Reliable risk prediction is essential for prevention and personalized care.

methodsUsing data from 12,222 patients aged ≥60 years in the MIMIC-IV database, we developed machine learning models with 24 clinically relevant features. Seven classifiers were trained and integrated via a stacking ensemble. Internal evaluation employed stratified fivefold cross-validation with 10 repetitions and bootstrapped confidence intervals (2,000 resamples). Multiple imputations (m = 2000) quantified uncertainty from missing data. External validation was performed in 355 patients from Nanjing First Hospital, with resampling to address class imbalance. Calibration metrics and SHAP analysis with bootstrapping were used to assess reliability and interpretability.

resultsThe ensemble model showed strong discrimination in both internal (AUC = 0.857) and external (AUC = 0.783) validation, with stable performance across imputations (mean AUC: 0.997 ± 0.004). Calibration analysis confirmed good agreement between predicted and observed risks. Key predictors as atrial fibrillation, lymphocyte count, and operative time were clinically plausible and robustly identified.

conclusionsThis study presents an externally validated and interpretable ensemble learning framework for early IAPI risk prediction in elderly cardiac surgery patients. Incorporating multiple imputation, bootstrapped calibration, and SHAP-based robustness, this approach improves methodological transparency and offers a clinically actionable tool for perioperative risk stratification and prevention. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT05855954. Registration date: March 21, 2023. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresIntraoperative ComplicationsMachine LearningPressure UlcerAgedAged, 80 and overClassification AlgorithmsEnsemble LearningFemaleHumansMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentEnsemble modelIntraoperative acquired pressure injuryMachine learningPrediction modelRisk factorSHAP framewok

Identifiers

PMID41466406
PMCPMC12859977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.