ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Prediction of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in elderly cardiac surgery patients via machine learning: model development with the MIMIC-IV and external validation.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05855954 (Application of Controlled Low Central Venous Pressure Technique in Early Intervention of Cardiac Surgery-associated Acute Kidney Injury), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Application of Controlled Low Central Venous Pressure Technique in Early Intervention of Cardiac Surgery-associated Acute Kidney Injury
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative acquired pressure injury (IAPI) represents a major risk in elderly cardiac surgery patients due to skin fragility and impaired perfusion. Reliable risk prediction is essential for prevention and personalized care.
methodsUsing data from 12,222 patients aged ≥60 years in the MIMIC-IV database, we developed machine learning models with 24 clinically relevant features. Seven classifiers were trained and integrated via a stacking ensemble. Internal evaluation employed stratified fivefold cross-validation with 10 repetitions and bootstrapped confidence intervals (2,000 resamples). Multiple imputations (m = 2000) quantified uncertainty from missing data. External validation was performed in 355 patients from Nanjing First Hospital, with resampling to address class imbalance. Calibration metrics and SHAP analysis with bootstrapping were used to assess reliability and interpretability.
resultsThe ensemble model showed strong discrimination in both internal (AUC = 0.857) and external (AUC = 0.783) validation, with stable performance across imputations (mean AUC: 0.997 ± 0.004). Calibration analysis confirmed good agreement between predicted and observed risks. Key predictors as atrial fibrillation, lymphocyte count, and operative time were clinically plausible and robustly identified.
conclusionsThis study presents an externally validated and interpretable ensemble learning framework for early IAPI risk prediction in elderly cardiac surgery patients. Incorporating multiple imputation, bootstrapped calibration, and SHAP-based robustness, this approach improves methodological transparency and offers a clinically actionable tool for perioperative risk stratification and prevention. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT05855954. Registration date: March 21, 2023. Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.