ArticleBMC medical education2025
Exploring doctors experiences of transitioning to full time research and back to clinical practice: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigation of Dual Identities Among Health Care Professionals Transitioning Between Clinical Practice and Research Roles: Scoping Review Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the growing interest in research degrees among clinicians, little is knowns about doctors’ lived experiences transitioning between clinical practice and full-time research. Understanding these transitions is essential for developing appropriate support structure and optimising career pathways. This study aimed to explore the experience for doctors of transitioning to research and back to clinical work.
methodsQualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis and the conceptual framework of Multiple and Multidimensional Transitions (MMT). Doctors undertaking or having completed full-time research participated in semi-structured interviews, analysed using template analysis.
resultsTen doctors (one man, nine women) took part in the research. Six were undertaking an doctorate of medicine (MD), three a doctorate of philosophy (PhD) and one a full time Masters (MSc). Six themes emerged: pre research phase, decision to undertake research, initial honeymoon, later reality, drive to complete and back to clinical practice. Participants chose research for career progression, teaching experience or a “break” from full time clinical practice. Initially there was a sense of freedom from the clinical weekly roster, enjoying the flexibility that research afforded them, and then frustration and disbelief over how long everything took to happen or come to fruition. Support was mainly from peers, with those who were part of a research group finding the transition easiest. After the initial novelty the reality of perhaps more tedious aspects of full time research became apparent. Experience with proposal writing, project execution, data analysis and writing was invaluable for future projects and medical literature interpretation. For those who had returned to full time clinical work, there was increased confidence as they had gained skills during their research years that made aspects of the clinical job easier. Maintaining clinical skills during research was essential for successful transition back to practice.
conclusionThis study reveals challenges in the research transition from clinical practice to research that were common to participants but often experienced in isolation. Findings highlight the need for enhanced peer support networks, realistic expectation-setting, and structured mentorship programmes to optimise the research training experience and facilitate successful return to clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.