Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466337›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2025

The role of signal in saltatory pursuit of cryptic stationary targets.

Eden J Forbes, Peter M Todd, Randall D Beer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eden J ForbesCognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. eforbes24@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1748-0668
Peter M ToddCognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Randall D BeerCognitive Science Program, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaltatory movement strategies in animal search are well known, but their role in pursuit and localization of targets is less so. There are multiple features of forager-target interactions that may generate saltatory forager movement during pursuit and/or localization of the target. Here, we explore how the reliability of the target's signal and the dependence of the forager's perception of that signal on the forager's own motion can generate a variety of different continuous and saltatory pursuit patterns in evolved model foragers with stationary targets.

methodsWe use dynamical analyses of evolved forager nervous systems to show the possible mechanisms through which saltatory movement was generated and how signals influence those movements in a foraging animal.

resultsSaltatory movement during pursuit independent of signal was routinely found when the forager's perception depended on its movement. Saltatory movement patterns could also be generated in otherwise cruise-like behaviors when target signal either excited or inhibited ongoing forager movement. Additionally, the magnitude of the signal's influence was found to depend on proximity to the target during pursuit.

conclusionsThese models present hypotheses for future empirical research and emphasize the importance of exploring variation in animal movement during different phases of foraging.

Indexed as

Agent-based modelAnimal movementForagingPursuitSaltatory movement

Identifiers

PMID41466337
PMCPMC12751294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.