Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466331›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2025

Characterising gut microbiome dysbiosis in diarrhoea calves from multiple farms in Inner Mongolia using 16S and metagenomics.

Junyan Li, Xin Zhang, Xiaochao Zhao, Gaowa Gong, Jian Li, Baolige Dalai, Ziran Mo, Xiaojing Xu, Xiaoqing Jia, Yaning Li and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Junyan Li *Key Laboratory of Grass-Feeding Livestock Healthy Breeding and Livestock Product Quality Control, Veterinary Research Institute, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, People's Republic of China.
Xin Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500, People's Republic of China.
Xiaochao Zhao *GeneMind Biosciences Company Limited, Shenzhen, 518001, People's Republic of China.
Gaowa GongKey Laboratory of Grass-Feeding Livestock Healthy Breeding and Livestock Product Quality Control, Veterinary Research Institute, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, People's Republic of China.
Jian LiBasic Medical College, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, 530200, People's Republic of China.
Baolige DalaiKey Laboratory of Grass-Feeding Livestock Healthy Breeding and Livestock Product Quality Control, Veterinary Research Institute, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, People's Republic of China.
Ziran MoCollege of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010021, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojing XuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010010, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqing JiaKey Laboratory of Grass-Feeding Livestock Healthy Breeding and Livestock Product Quality Control, Veterinary Research Institute, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, People's Republic of China.
Yaning LiKey Laboratory of Grass-Feeding Livestock Healthy Breeding and Livestock Product Quality Control, Veterinary Research Institute, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, People's Republic of China.
Juan LaiGeneMind Biosciences Company Limited, Shenzhen, 518001, People's Republic of China.
Penglong WangKey Laboratory of Grass-Feeding Livestock Healthy Breeding and Livestock Product Quality Control, Veterinary Research Institute, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, People's Republic of China.
Lei SunGeneMind Biosciences Company Limited, Shenzhen, 518001, People's Republic of China.
Yongfeng LiuGeneMind Biosciences Company Limited, Shenzhen, 518001, People's Republic of China. liuyongfeng@genemind.com.
Xiaoping LuoKey Laboratory of Grass-Feeding Livestock Healthy Breeding and Livestock Product Quality Control, Veterinary Research Institute, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, 010031, People's Republic of China. luoxpnmg@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pathogenesis of neonatal calf diarrhoea (NCD), a critical disease that contributes to neonatal mortality in calves, remains nebulous.

resultsInner Mongolia, a key region for cattle farming in China, was selected as a study area to provide a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology and treatment of calf diarrhoea. No significant correlation was found between the incidence of diarrhoea and sampling points or medications. The severity of diarrhoea cases was stratified into five levels based on faecal characteristics. To elucidate the pathogenesis of NCD, 16S rRNA gene and metagenomic sequencing analyses were performed across severity levels. Microbial diversity analyses revealed distinct variations in microbial communities at different severity levels. Employing binning and LEfSe methodologies, two potential bacterial pathogens were identified: Escherichia coli (bin.216), leveraging non-canonical virulence mechanisms; and Streptococcus ruminantium (bin.338), an uncharacterised diarrhoeagenic bacterium. Furthermore, the viral agent Escherichia phage VpaE1_ev108 was significantly associated with disease progression. Gene function enrichment analysis revealed a broad spectrum of antibiotic resistance genes even in farms without direct antibiotic treatment, underscoring the pervasive prevalence of drug resistance.

conclusionsThe findings of this study revealed significant gut microbial dysbiosis in calves with severe diarrhoea, through which two putative NCD-associated pathogens were identified: E. coli (bin.216) and S. ruminantium (bin.338). Marked enrichment of Bacteroides spp. and Methanobrevibacter_A sp. 900313645 was observed in healthy cohorts, suggesting their potential protective roles. Therapeutic strategies employing phage-mediated pathogen targeting combined with probiotic transplantation have demonstrated dual benefits, potentially reducing antimicrobial dependency and preserving microbial homeostasis through ecological network reconstruction. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

BacteriaCattle DiseasesDiarrheaDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomicsAnimalsCattleChinaEscherichia coliFarmsFecesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntibiotic resistance genesMetagenome-assembled genomesNeonatal calf diarrhoeaPhagesStreptococcus ruminantium

Identifiers

PMID41466331
PMCPMC12751507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.