ArticlePlant methods2025
A selection index with minimal genetic relatedness for multi-trait data via binary quadratic programming.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) in plant breeding aims to identify individuals with superior genetic merit while maintaining genetic diversity within populations. In plant breeding, considering multiple traits simultaneously makes optimizing selection complex, especially under genetic relatedness constraints. In this study, we propose a binary quadratic programming framework for constructing a multi-trait selection index that maximizes genetic gain while minimizing average pairwise relatedness appropriate for identifying superior candidates for advancement in the breeding pipeline. The approach combines estimated breeding values (EBVs) across multiple traits by applying trait-specific economic weights, while simultaneously accounting for coancestry through the genomic relationship matrix. By formulating the selection problem as a constrained Quadratic Programing Multi-trait Selection Index (QPMSI), our method enables the identification of a fixed number of candidate individuals that jointly optimize selection index values and control genetic relatedness. We evaluated the performance of the proposed method using five real genomic datasets and demonstrated that it provides a more effective balance between selection response and control of genetic relatedness than the Linear Programming Multi-trait Selection Index (LPMSI). In particular, the QPMSI consistently outperformed the LPMSI in terms of the MV metric (gain-to-degree of relatedness ratio), achieving improvements of at least 53.8%. This framework offers a practical and computationally efficient tool for sustainable breeding strategies in multi-trait selection contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.