ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Cancer treatment shared decision-making and coping during the COVID-19 pandemic (CAN-DECIDE): a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe hypothesized that cancer patients, their family members, and cancer and palliative care practitioners were experiencing significant COVID-related stress and changes to cancer care and sought to characterize contributing factors.
methodsWe completed a mixed methods study to explore cancer care-related experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic of cancer patients, family members, and cancer and palliative care practitioners. Participants were recruited from an ongoing clinical trial.
resultsPatients were pursuing curative-intent surgeries for upper gastrointestinal cancers. Between October 2020 and July 2021, we collected 491 surveys from 181 cancer patients and 26 family caregivers and conducted 71 in-depth interviews with 48 cancer patients, 6 family caregivers, and 19 practitioners. Patient-reported quality-of-life measurements were not associated with a corresponding COVID surge. Patients and caregivers were generally satisfied with their care, trusted providers, and were often unaware of pandemic-related changes. In contrast, practitioners reported significant pandemic-related changes to cancer care delivery with associated practitioner anxiety, fatigue, and moral distress. All felt that visitor restrictions negatively impacted care.
conclusionsOur data suggest that cancer patients coped well overall despite pandemic-related disruptions whereas cancer care clinicians experienced significant stress. These findings can inform future disaster-preparedness planning and policy-setting in institutions providing cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.