Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466250›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Readiness to transition to HPV self-collection from VIA screening: a mixed methods health systems assessment from Tamil Nadu, India.

Anu Mary Oommen, Maleeha Ashfaq, Vidhya Viswanathan, Pravin Singarayar, Venugopal Muniswamy, Sathishrajaa Palaniraja, Priya Ranjani D, Harini Sri Ravikumar, Shalini Jeyapaul, Sumit Kane and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anu Mary OommenDepartment of Community Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India. anuoommen@cmcvellore.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2932-7827
Maleeha AshfaqCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3272-2980
Vidhya ViswanathanDirectorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8576-2976
Pravin SingarayarTribal Health Initiative, Sittilingi, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6709-8539
Venugopal MuniswamyDirectorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3186-7602
Sathishrajaa PalanirajaInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-420X
Priya Ranjani DDepartment of Community Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0164-7047
Harini Sri RavikumarDepartment of Community Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4402-4346
Shalini JeyapaulDepartment of Community Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0528-1580
Sumit KaneNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4858-7344
T S SelvinayagamDirectorate of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2175-9927
Partha BasuInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-4050
Julia M L BrothertonCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2304-3105

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a frontrunner in introducing cervical screening in India, the state of Tamil Nadu urgently needs to consider how to improve screening rates and switch to Human Papillomavirus (HPV) detection tests.

methodsWe used a mixed methods design to assess the readiness of the state health system for delivering the current cervical screening program, as well as for future HPV self-collection. Following a desk review, we surveyed 14 government health facilities in three districts of Tamil Nadu and calculated overall and domain-specific (service utilization, service availability, general service, cervical screening) readiness scores as percentages. We conducted four interviews and five focus group discussions with 37 participants [managers, primary care nurses, community health workers (CHWs)] to clarify findings and obtain suggestions regarding the introduction of HPV self-collection in tribal, rural, and urban low-resource settings.

resultsScores for general services and readiness to offer visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and follow-up were more than 70% in the surveyed facilities. Despite the availability of trained nurses, infrastructure and resources, utilisation was primarily limited to symptomatic women attending health facilities due to poor acceptability of screening that would require facility visits. Most participants felt that self-collection could reduce women's fear and embarrassment and could be delivered through CHWs in the community or by nurses at facilities. However, motivation for screening may remain low as most asymptomatic women do not perceive a need for screening, and/or fear implications of a positive test. Tertiary laboratories appear ready for HPV testing, given availability of high-throughput PCR equipment, computerised laboratory information management systems, and a planned hub and spoke model of improving access to laboratory tests.

conclusionsDespite relatively good infrastructure and staffing for VIA screening in public healthcare facilities, service utilisation was primarily by symptomatic women, contributing to low screening rates. HPV self-collection was highly acceptable to administrative and field staff. Widespread educational approaches to motivate asymptomatic women to screen using self-collection, with decentralised sample collection and treatment, could potentially improve cervical screening rates. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMass ScreeningPapillomavirus InfectionsSelf CareSpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansIndiaInterviews as TopicPapillomaviridaeCapacity assessmentCervical cancer screeningCommunity health workersHealth systemHPV detection testSelf-collection

Identifiers

PMID41466250
PMCPMC12751595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.