Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466248›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

'I imagine teams!' - exploring the potential of team-based long-term brain injury rehabilitation in North Norway.

Morten Nikolaisen, Cathrine Arntzen, Marianne Eliassen, Lina Forslund, Hege K Andreassen, Astrid Gramstad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Morten NikolaisenDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway. morten.nikolaisen@uit.no.
Cathrine ArntzenDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Marianne EliassenDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Lina ForslundDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Hege K AndreassenDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.
Astrid GramstadDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcquired brain injury (ABI) is a leading cause of disability in adults worldwide, often resulting in long-term impairments that hinder community integration. While advancements in acute care have improved ABI survival rates, significant gaps remain in long-term follow-up. These gaps are exacerbated in rural areas, where dispersed populations, long distances, and limited access to rehabilitation professionals pose challenges. Although team-based approaches are crucial for effective ABI rehabilitation, these approaches have yet to be fully integrated into long-term care, thus highlighting the need for innovation. This study explores the potential of team-based organisation in improving long-term rehabilitation services for individuals with ABI in the rural context of North Norway.

methodsThis study employed a collaborative knowledge generation framework inspired by Experience-based Co-design, wherein researchers work with stakeholders to align research efforts and service development. Data were generated during a full-day workshop during which two focus groups comprising health and welfare professionals (n = 10) and individuals with ABI (n = 3) explored the potential of team-based organisation in improving long-term ABI rehabilitation services in a rural context. The data were analysed using a predominantly inductive approach to thematic analysis.

resultsFour key themes were identified: (1) establishing municipal ‘core teams’ at the primary healthcare level to strengthen local rehabilitation services; (2) enhancing care continuity through ongoing collaboration between the core teams and existing specialist ambulatory rehabilitation teams; (3) sharing the management of long-term rehabilitation trajectories between teams; and (4) using teams as platforms for professional learning and knowledge sharing. These themes informed the construction of a framework designed to guide the development and application of team-based long-term ABI rehabilitation.

conclusionsThis study highlights the potential of team-based organisation in enhancing long-term rehabilitation services for individuals with ABI in rural contexts. Establishing core teams within municipalities and fostering ongoing collaboration between these teams and specialist healthcare teams can bridge service gaps to promote community integration and self-management. The proposed framework can guide the development and application of team-based long-term ABI rehabilitation in rural regions. Further research is needed to evaluate the framework’s real-world applicability and impact on rehabilitation outcomes, professional development, and overall service effectiveness.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesPatient Care TeamRural Health ServicesCooperative BehaviorFocus GroupsHumansNorwayRural PopulationBrain injuriesCo-designHealthcare teamsInterdisciplinary careRehabilitationRural areas

Identifiers

PMID41466248
PMCPMC12772063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.