Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466233›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

External validation of the Baseline Recurrence Risk in Cellulitis (BRRISC) score and the added impact of acute clinical response: a prospective cohort study.

Elizabeth L A Cross, Gail N Hayward, Martin J Llewelyn, A Sarah Walker

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth L A CrossDepartment of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9PX, UK. E.Cross1@bsms.ac.uk.
Gail N HaywardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Primary Care Building, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Rd, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Martin J Llewelyn *Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Brighton and University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9PX, UK.
A Sarah Walker *Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR300952Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit on Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare Associated Infection in partnership with the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) NIHR200915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe BRRISC score was developed to predict hospital-attended cellulitis recurrence using clinical data routinely available at presentation. In practice, clinicians assess patients' response to treatment during the recommended 48-72-hour antibiotic review point when deciding on the duration of antibiotic treatment to achieve lasting recovery. We evaluated the performance of the BRRISC score in an external validation cohort and examined whether incorporating markers of acute clinical response could improve it.

methodsWe recruited adults with lower limb cellulitis attending hospital. From days 0-3 of treatment, we assessed markers of acute clinical response, including physical examination findings (e.g. affected size, oedema), objective measurements of limb temperature taken with a thermal imaging camera, vital signs, blood test results, and patient-reported symptoms. Outcomes included 'hospital-attended recurrence' (primary outcome for validation) and 'any recurrence' (hospital-attended or community). Using multivariate logistic regression with backwards elimination, we identified response variables independently associated with either outcome that could be included within an extended score. Performance was assessed using the C-index.

resultsOf 202 patients, 8% (n = 17) experienced 'hospital-attended recurrence' and 23% (n = 46) 'any recurrence'. In this validation dataset, the BRRISC score had a C-index = 0.75 (95%CI, 0.64-0.86) for predicting 'hospital-attended recurrence' vs. 0.65 (0.63-0.68) in the original development population, but only 0.60 (0.51-0.69) for the new outcome 'any recurrence'. There was weak evidence that an extended score, incorporating day-2/3 severity of skin blistering, improved the C-index for 'hospital-attended recurrence' to 0.83 (0.75-0.92). No acute clinical response variables were independently associated with 'any recurrence' after adjusting for BRRISC score.

conclusionsThe BRRISC score can help identify patients with cellulitis at the highest risk for hospital-attended recurrence. Markers of acute clinical response, typically used by clinicians to inform antibiotic treatment decisions during the 48-72-hour antibiotic review period, did not add helpful prognostic value beyond the baseline factors included in the score. Whether treatment response after day-3 improves recurrence prediction could be further explored, but future research should focus on evaluating the potential for baseline risk stratification to personalise antibiotic duration and guide non-antibiotic approaches for preventing recurrence. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCellulitisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRecurrenceSeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Bacterial AgentsCellulitisClinical responseRecurrenceRisk predictionSkin and soft tissue infection

Identifiers

PMID41466233
PMCPMC12751828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.