ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Contextual and culturally adapted interventions to improve HIV outcomes: a scoping review.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Qualitative Analysis to Inform Preimplementation of a Stepped-Care Model for Depression Care Among Older People Living With HIV in Ibadan, Nigeria.AIDS research and treatment · 2026Article
- Mapping Psychosocial Interventions for Mental Health and Well-Being Among Pregnant Women Living with HIV: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Using nominal group technique to select an HIV status disclosure decision aid for adaptation in Georgia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Identifying Key Intervention Attributes Driving Acceptability of Spouse/Partner-Centered HIV Interventions in Vietnam Using Conjoint Analysis.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntiretroviral therapy is widely available, yet structural, social, and cultural barriers still limit human immunodeficiency virus prevention and care. Prevention tools such as consistent condom use and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) remain essential. Interventions that ignore local context and culture often have low uptake, especially among adolescents, Indigenous communities, and sexual minorities.
objectiveTo map and synthesize contextually and culturally adapted interventions that aim to improve outcomes related to human immunodeficiency virus.
methodThis scoping review followed the Arksey and O Malley framework and the PRISMA ScR guideline. We searched Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL used keywords for human immunodeficiency virus, contextual delivery, and cultural adaptation. Eligible studies involved people living with human immunodeficiency virus or populations at substantial risk. Interventions had to be tailored to setting or culture in health care or community contexts. We defined contextual or cultural adaptation as development or modification with local stakeholder input and the inclusion of culturally salient elements such as values, norms, language, imagery, community delivery agents, or locally meaningful practices. As a scoping review, we did not conduct formal study-level quality appraisal. Data were extracted with a standardized form and synthesized narratively.
resultsEighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included community-based counseling and peer programs; digital approaches such as mobile and electronic health (including short message service reminders, smartphone applications, and tele-counseling); complementary mind-body strategies; and couple or family models tailored for marginalized groups. Seven cross-cutting themes appeared: (1) culturally grounded psychosocial support; (2) technology-enabled adherence and care engagement; (3) mind-body strategies addressing stigma, stress, and resilience; (4) couple and family involvement for communication and support; (5) tailoring for adolescents and structurally marginalized groups; (6) addressing specific sexual behaviours and HIV prevention (e.g., reducing condomless sex, increasing HIV testing, and uptake of PrEP and post-exposure prophylaxis [PEP]); and (7) quality-of-life and mental-health enhancement. Many studies reported improvements associated with these approaches, such as better adherence, lower stigma, increased HIV testing and PrEP uptake, and reductions in condomless sex, alongside gains in psychological resilience and mental health. Effects on clinical endpoints were mixed, and some studies reported null findings.
conclusionsContextual and cultural adaptation is a promising direction for improving engagement with human immunodeficiency virus prevention and care. Future research should use adequately powered evaluations in diverse settings, assess durability and scalability in routine systems, and report adaptation processes in enough detail to support replication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.