ArticleBMC surgery2025
Unlocking the key requirements and capabilities for a training app on surgical tools and operating room equipment.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SurgeryMate app: developing and evaluating a training app for surgical instruments and operating room equipment.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study was conducted with the aim of extracting data elements and analyzing the design and development requirements of a mobile-based training app for general surgical tools and Operating Room (OR) equipment for OR students. METHODS AND MATERIAL: In the initial phase of the study, essential data were collected through a review of academic resources, clinical guidelines, and existing digital apps, with the aim of identifying the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and key functional requirements for a mobile-based training app. Based on the findings of this phase, a researcher-developed questionnaire was designed and distributed. Its validity was assessed using face and content validity methods, and its reliability was confirmed through calculation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The final MDS was determined based on the perspectives of subject-matter experts and educators.
resultsThe main components of the app, as determined through expert surveys, include sections on surgical instruments, specialized OR equipment, an alphabetical index of instruments, and essential guidelines on the proper use, maintenance, safety, cleaning, and troubleshooting procedures before, during, and after operation. In addition, the app's design requirements were also identified, such as user registration, access through a verification code, and the ability to navigate to sections like training materials, "About Us," and recommended resources for further learning.
conclusionThis study successfully identified and organized the complete set of design specifications and data components necessary for developing a training app aimed at OR trainees, specifically focused on surgical tools and equipment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.