ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
A scoping review of mobile health for ART adherence in pregnant and breastfeeding women with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: preferences, acceptability, and privacy concerns.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterventions involving Mobile Health (mHealth) have shown promise to improve retention in care and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among pregnant or breastfeeding women living with HIV (PBWLH). However, there are concerns surrounding the message preferences, acceptability, and confidentiality. This study aims to map and summarize the available evidence on the use of mHealth interventions in HIV care, especially ART adherence and retention in care, among PBWLH in sub-Saharan Africa, as well as their preferences, acceptability, and privacy concerns about these mHealth interventions. METHODOLOGY: This scoping review was conducted through a comprehensive search using PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and AJOL following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Search terms included combinations of "mHealth," "telehealth," "SMS," "pregnant," "HIV," "Breastfeeding," and "sub-Saharan Africa" using Boolean operators (AND, OR). Studies were assessed for eligibility, ensuring that only primary studies focusing on mHealth in PBWLH in sub-Saharan Africa were included.
resultsA total of 10 eligible studies were included, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), qualitative studies, and mixed-methods research. The sample sizes ranged from 20 to 825 participants, focusing on PBWLH in sub-Saharan Africa. The mHealth tools included SMS-based texts and phone calls. Most participants preferred covert messages when compared with overt messages due to privacy concerns such as unintentional disclosure of status and phone sharing. Also, there was a high acceptability of mHealth interventions. For the studies on retention in care (n = 5), three studies showed positive impact of mHealth intervention compared to control whereas two studies were not statistically significant. The two studies had a long intervention length compared to the three which showed positive impact.
conclusionThe acceptability of mHealth interventions among PBLWH in sub-Saharan Africa is high, with a higher preference for covert messages. mHealth shows promise in improving retention in care and ART adherence, however, there are mixed results and insufficient evidence. More randomized controlled trials are needed in other sub-Saharan regions to provide more evidence. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.