ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2026
Diagnostic utility and pitfalls of human T-lymphotropic virus serology in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma: evidence from a 25-year pathology-based nonendemic cohort.
Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) is a distinct type of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) driven by human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-1)-infected T cells, but diagnosis can be confounded by histological overlap with non-ATLL PTCL. While molecular testing is the diagnostic gold standard in endemic areas, HTLV-1/2 serology is often used as a surrogate in nonendemic settings, yet its accuracy and limitations remain unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 881 PTCL cases over 25 years at two tertiary referral hospitals in Taiwan, where HTLV-1 is nonendemic. Serology was available in 48.2% of cases. Molecular confirmation was performed using HBZ in situ hybridization and tax quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Among the 44 seropositive PTCL patients with tissue available, 37 were diagnosed and molecularly confirmed as ATLL. Of the seven initially diagnosed as non-ATLL PTCL, three were reclassified as ATLL, while four showed no molecular evidence, including three likely false seropositives with borderline signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) values in serology assay and T follicular helper cell phenotype. In seropositive PTCL, clinicopathologic interpretation without molecular testing yielded 100% positive predictive value, 93% sensitivity, and 93% accuracy, compared with 91% positive predictive value by serology alone. In addition, retrospective molecular screening in 59 PTCL without prior serologic data revealed one case of ATLL that had initially been overlooked. In conclusion, our findings support routine HTLV-1/2 serologic testing in all newly diagnosed PTCLs. However, interpretation should be guided by clinicopathological correlation and serology index values. Borderline index results warrant molecular confirmation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.