Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466141›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026

Development and validation of an interpretable predictive model for short-term rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis in peptic ulcer: a retrospective single-center cohort study.

Run-Hua Li, Ying Zhu, Wen Xu

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Run-Hua LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Southern Medical University (Shenzhen School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University), Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Ying ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, No. 13 Xinhu Road, Baoan District, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wen XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, No. 13 Xinhu Road, Baoan District, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. xuwen0217@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9163-3449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeptic ulcer bleeding (PUB) is a common, life-threatening disorder. Although endoscopic therapy achieves hemostasis, short-term rebleeding remains frequent, increasing mortality and healthcare burden. Existing tools lack accuracy and interpretability. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict rebleeding risk after initial therapy in PUB.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with Forrest Ia-IIb PUB undergoing emergency hemostasis at Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University (June 2019-September 2023). Among 204 patients, 25 (12.25%) rebled. Nineteen clinical and laboratory features were collected, and 11 ML algorithms were evaluated. Data were split 7:3 into training and testing sets. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score, and Youden index. The best model was interpreted using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).

resultsCategorical boosting (CATBoost) achieved the best performance (AUC 0.980 training; 0.817 testing). Calibration confirmed stability. SHAP identified Rockall score, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), AIMS65 score, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, and lesion location (particularly the descending duodenum) as the most important predictors. A web-based calculator was developed for individualized risk estimation.

conclusionWe established and validated an interpretable CATBoost model using routine variables to predict short-term rebleeding in PUB. This tool may aid early identification of high-risk patients and support individualized management strategies.

trial registrationThis study was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn/ with the registration number ChiCTR2300079290.

Indexed as

Hemostasis, EndoscopicMachine LearningPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentEndoscopic hemostasisExplainable artificial intelligenceMachine learning modelPeptic ulcer bleedingRebleeding risk prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.