ArticleScientific reports2025
XcepFusion for brain tumor detection using a hybrid transfer learning framework with layer pruning and freezing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For effective treatment options and better patient outcomes, early and accurate diagnosis of brain tumors is essential. This research introduces an innovative strategy to improving brain tumor diagnosis accuracy by combining deep learning with traditional machine learning classifiers. This research investigation employs the Xception Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) through a transfer learning approach as a feature extractor via two distinct strategies: (1) pruning the CNN’s classification layers while freezing the remaining layers, and (2) utilizing feature extraction with all CNN layers frozen. The extracted features are subsequently classified utilizing five traditional classifiers: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Logistic Regression (LR). The suggested approaches are assessed using the BR35H: Brain Tumor Detection 2020 dataset, which is publicly accessible on Kaggle and includes a thorough collection of labeled MRI scans of the brain for both training and testing purposes. Results show that the hybrid models achieve exceptional performance, with both transfer learning-based strategies providing highly accurate tumor classification. Specifically, the Xception model with frozen CNN layers and feature extraction yielded testing accuracies of 0.9900 for Logistic Regression (LR) and 0.9850 for K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). In comparison, pruning the CNN layers and freezing the remaining layers also resulted in comparable high performance, with testing accuracies of 0.9883 for KNN and 0.9900 for Logistic Regression (LR). According to these results, brain tumor diagnosis may be made much more efficient and accurate by combining deep learning feature extraction with standard machine learning classifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.