Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466130›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

XcepFusion for brain tumor detection using a hybrid transfer learning framework with layer pruning and freezing.

Deependra Rastogi, Prashant Johri, Seifedine Kadry, SeongKi Kim, Lalit Kumar, Vishwadeepak Singh Baghela, Arfat Ahmad Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deependra RastogiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, IILM University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201306, India.
Prashant JohriSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, IILM University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201306, India.
Seifedine KadryDepartment of Computer Science and Mathematics, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon.
SeongKi KimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Chosun University, Gwangju, 61452, Republic of Korea. skkim@chosun.ac.kr.
Lalit KumarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, IILM University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201306, India.
Vishwadeepak Singh BaghelaSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 203201, India.
Arfat Ahmad KhanDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computing, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand.

Funding

Global-Learning & Academic research institution for Master's·PhD students, and Postdocs(LAMP) Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) RS-2023-00285353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For effective treatment options and better patient outcomes, early and accurate diagnosis of brain tumors is essential. This research introduces an innovative strategy to improving brain tumor diagnosis accuracy by combining deep learning with traditional machine learning classifiers. This research investigation employs the Xception Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) through a transfer learning approach as a feature extractor via two distinct strategies: (1) pruning the CNN’s classification layers while freezing the remaining layers, and (2) utilizing feature extraction with all CNN layers frozen. The extracted features are subsequently classified utilizing five traditional classifiers: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Logistic Regression (LR). The suggested approaches are assessed using the BR35H: Brain Tumor Detection 2020 dataset, which is publicly accessible on Kaggle and includes a thorough collection of labeled MRI scans of the brain for both training and testing purposes. Results show that the hybrid models achieve exceptional performance, with both transfer learning-based strategies providing highly accurate tumor classification. Specifically, the Xception model with frozen CNN layers and feature extraction yielded testing accuracies of 0.9900 for Logistic Regression (LR) and 0.9850 for K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). In comparison, pruning the CNN layers and freezing the remaining layers also resulted in comparable high performance, with testing accuracies of 0.9883 for KNN and 0.9900 for Logistic Regression (LR). According to these results, brain tumor diagnosis may be made much more efficient and accurate by combining deep learning feature extraction with standard machine learning classifiers.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsClassification AlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerRandom ForestSupport Vector MachineTransfer Machine LearningBrain tumorConvolutional neural networkDecision tree, random forestDeep learningFeature extractionKNNLogistic regressionMachine learning techniqueMagnetic resonance imagingSVMTransfer learningXception, classification

Identifiers

PMID41466130
PMCPMC12852129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.