ArticleScientific reports2025
Limited therapeutic efficacy of N-acetyl-L-leucine in a mouse model of CLN1 disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CLN1 disease, one of the most severe forms of neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (NCLs or Batten disease), is a rapidly progressing pediatric neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in the PPT1 gene. The disease is characterized by lysosomal storage accumulation, an early onset neuroimmune response, motor impairment, and premature death. N-acetyl-L-leucine (NALL), an orally bioavailable modified amino acid, has demonstrated clinical efficacy in Niemann–Pick type C and other lysosomal storage disorders. Here, we assessed the efficacy of chronic NALL treatment in the Ppt1−/− mouse model of CLN1 disease. Mice received NALL (0.1 g/kg/day) in chow either from weaning (1 month, presymptomatic) or from 4 months (symptomatic) until 7 months (normal disease endstage), with additional survival cohorts. NALL treatment did not extend survival in Ppt1−/− mice and produced no significant improvement in gait coordination or rotarod performance, with only minimal improvements in select gait variability parameters in presymptomatically treated mice. Histological analyses revealed no reduction in microglial or astrocyte activation, nor in storage material accumulation, key CLN1 disease-associated phenotypes. These findings indicate that NALL monotherapy has limited therapeutic efficacy in CLN1 disease mice and suggest that its mechanisms of action may not address the underlying pathophysiology of this disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.