ArticleScientific reports2025
A method for detecting metal surface defects using a dynamic fine-grained multi-branch encoder.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the challenges of low localization accuracy, weak feature discrimination, and real-time constraints in small-scale metallic surface defect detection, this study proposes a novel detection framework named FF-MDE (fine-grained multi-branch diversified encoder). The proposed model enhances detection capability through three key modules: a direction-aware multi-branch convolutional block (BBDES) that strengthens orientation-sensitive feature extraction via re-parameterization; a multi-scale fusion network (MFFN) incorporating a location-offset heterogeneous kernel selection strategy and a channel cross-embedding mechanism to align cross-resolution features and expand receptive fields adaptively; and a lightweight attention-guided up-sampling that improves fine-detail recovery while suppressing irrelevant responses. A large number of experiments on the NEU-DET and GC10-DET datasets show that FF-MDE has achieved excellent performance. The indicators of mAP50 are 70.3 and 57.9% respectively, which are 4.1 and 3.3% higher than the benchmark model and 7.6 and 6.5% higher on average than the existing methods. Moreover, the real-time inference speed of this network exceeds 60 FPS, providing a powerful and deployable solution for high-precision defect detection in industrial vision inspection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.