Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41466044›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

From data to safer roads: predictive modelling and causal analysis of road fatalities in Australia.

Saeid Afshari, Ali Soltani, Mohammad Amin Amiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saeid AfshariDepartment of Computer Engineering, Shahreza Campus, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. s.afshari@shr.ui.ac.ir.
Ali SoltaniSchool of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (HASS), University of New England, Sydney, Australia.
Mohammad Amin AmiriDepartment of Computer Science, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study uses advanced time-series forecasting and causal modelling techniques to examine long-term patterns in Australian road traffic fatalities. Four statistical approaches were assessed: Holt-Winters, Theta, TBATS, and Vector Autoregression, with each offering strengths across different forecasting horizons. TBATS provided the most reliable short-term predictions, while Vector Autoregression performed best for medium- and long-term projections. A causal analysis using a random-effects panel model identified several key contributors to fatal crash risk, including older age groups, remote and outer-regional settings, nighttime periods, and high-speed environments. In contrast, younger adults and single-vehicle crashes were associated with lower fatality likelihood. Overall, the results demonstrate the value of flexible time-series techniques and panel data methods for guiding evidence-based road safety policy, targeted interventions, and infrastructure planning.

Indexed as

Causal inferenceFatalityForecastingPolicy evaluationRoad safetyTime-series analysis

Identifiers

PMID41466044
PMCPMC12852097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.