ArticleScientific reports2025
Mean shift based prototypical network for steel surface anomaly recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Steel production plays a crucial role in the global economy, and surface defects in hot-rolled steel sheets significantly affect product quality and consumer acceptance. This paper introduces Mean Shift based Prototypical network (MSPro-Net), a novel and effective Prototypical network based on mean drift for classifying surface defects early in the manufacturing process. Key contributions of this study include the introduction of MSPro-Net's adaptive prototype computation, which uses the mean-shift method to improve defect detection. Unlike the classical Prototypical network (CL-ProNet), MSPro-Net produces a prototype that better represents all examples within a class, leading to significantly higher accuracy. Additionally, MSPro-Net is highly effective in few-shot learning scenarios, achieving excellent results with limited training data. Extensive experimental evaluations demonstrate that MSPro-Net consistently outperforms CL-ProNet in multiple N-way K-shot scenarios. For example, on the 6-way 25-shot NEU dataset, MSPro-Net achieves 98.67% accuracy com-pared to 50.67% for the classical network. Similar improvements are observed on the 7-way 25-shot XSDD and 10-way 25-shot GC10-Det datasets, with MSPro-Net achieving 96.00% and 90.00% accuracy, respectively, far exceeding the classical network's performance. These results highlight the superior performance of MSPro-Net across both small and large datasets.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.