ArticleScientific reports2025
Psychological and physical distress in patients with advanced cancer after the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with serious psychological distress among US adult cancer survivors: a cross-sectional observational analysis of the 2024 National Health Interview Survey.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pandemic has exacerbated psychological and physical distress in vulnerable populations, including patients with advanced cancer. However, the full scope and nature of this distress in the post-pandemic era remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the psychological distress and physical symptom burden between two independent cohorts of patients with advanced cancer undergoing active treatment, assessed during versus after the COVID-19 pandemic. In a comparative cross-sectional design, two independent cohorts were evaluated: during-pandemic (n = 129; March-April 2020) and post-pandemic (n = 102; September 2023-February 2024) using HADS and ESAS. The prevalence of clinically significant anxiety was significantly lower in the post-pandemic cohort (35, 34%; 95% CI: 26.7–40.3%) compared to the during-pandemic cohort (54, 53%;95% CI: 46.7–62.9%; p = 0.021). In contrast, the prevalence of depression remained persistently high (43, 42% vs. 51, 50%; p = 0.57). The ESAS scores indicated that the symptoms were mild (with a range of 0 to 3) for both groups, and there were no significant differences in any of the items, including anxiety and depression. Although anxiety decreased after the pandemic, depression persisted. This underscores the need for sustained psychological monitoring in cancer survivorship care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.