Observational studyMedicine2025
Application of intentional reimplantation in the treatment of severe periodontitis.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A proposed clinical framework for intentional tooth replantation based on healing dynamics: case series.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Intentional replantation as an alternative treatment: survival analysis and key prognostic indicators.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe periodontitis is a major cause of tooth loss, and the management of hopeless teeth remains a clinical challenge. Intentional reimplantation has been proposed as a conservative alternative to extraction and prosthetic replacement, but its clinical value in periodontitis-affected teeth has not been fully established. In this study, sixty patients with severe periodontitis, each contributing a single tooth, underwent intentional reimplantation and were followed for 18 months. Clinical examinations and radiographic assessments were performed at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after surgery. At the final follow-up, 53 teeth were successfully retained, corresponding to a survival rate of 88.3%, with cumulative survival rates of 100%, 96.7%, 95.0%, and 91.7% at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Among the retained teeth, 45 (85.0%) developed ankylosis, and the overall improvement rate in mobility reached 83.3%. Periodontal parameters, including probing depth and adjacent bone loss, were significantly improved compared with baseline values (P < .05). These findings indicate that intentional reimplantation is an effective approach for selected teeth with severe periodontitis, allowing for preservation of natural dentition and restoration of function. Although ankylosis frequently represents the predominant healing modality, the procedure remains clinically valuable and may serve as an alternative treatment when conventional periodontal therapy is inadequate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.