Observational studyMedicine2025
The role of stroke emergency specialist nurses in revascularization therapy for acute ischemic stroke.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the impact of stroke emergency nurses' involvement in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke through revascularization. This retrospective study analyzed 280 patients with acute ischemic stroke who were admitted to the emergency department of Cangzhou Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital between January 2021 and June 2023. According to the type of emergency management received, patients were divided into 2 groups: 140 patients who received standard emergency care (control group) and 140 patients whose treatment process additionally involved stroke emergency specialist nurses (intervention group). Clinical data, including demographic characteristics, revascularization time intervals, neurological function after revascularization, and overall therapeutic outcomes, were collected from the hospital's medical records and compared between the 2 groups. The intervention group exhibited shorter time intervals for each treatment stage compared to the control group (P < .001). After 7 and 30 days of revascularization, the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale scores of the intervention group were lower than those of the control group (P < .05). Additionally, after 90 days, the modified Rankin scale scores of the intervention group were also significantly lower (P < .001), indicating better recovery. Involving stroke emergency nurses in the revascularization process for acute ischemic stroke patients leads to reduced treatment time at various stages and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.