ReviewMedicine2025
Chronic disease self-management in heart failure: A narrative review of performance gaps and emerging solutions.
Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and global trends in self-care among patients with heart failure: challenges and opportunities.The journal of cardiovascular aging · 2026Article
- Practice-based observations of barriers to dietary adherence among patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure in a safety-net hospital.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure remains a major global health challenge, and despite therapeutic advances, chronic disease self-management continues to show significant gaps at patient, provider, and system levels. This narrative review synthesizes evidence published between 2000 and 2025 across randomized trials, systematic reviews, guideline statements, and qualitative studies to examine the effectiveness of education, lifestyle modification, medication adherence strategies, digital health tools, and psychosocial support in improving self-management outcomes. The literature consistently demonstrates that patient education, structured exercise, and dietary modification enhance clinical and quality-of-life outcomes, while digital health interventions offer promising but variable long-term benefits. Persistent disparities rooted in socioeconomic status, cultural beliefs, health literacy, and access to technology influence the uptake and effectiveness of self-management strategies. Implementation science underscores challenges related to cost, scalability, and sustainability, whereas patient perspectives emphasize the need for simplified treatment regimens, caregiver involvement, and culturally tailored education. Overall, optimizing chronic disease self-management in heart failure requires a holistic, patient-centered approach that integrates evidence-based strategies with real-world implementation considerations and equity-focused adaptations. Future research should prioritize digital health innovations, caregiver-patient dyadic models, and culturally adapted interventions to reduce disparities and improve long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.