Observational studyMedicine2025
Automated pupillometry predicts neurological deterioration in the neurosurgical ICU: A retrospective observational study with secondary analysis in traumatic brain injury.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to test whether sedation depth mediates the association between pupillary reactivity, quantified by the Neurological Pupil index (NPi) and significant neurological deterioration in critically ill neurosurgical patients. A prespecified secondary objective was to explore whether this relationship differs between traumatic brain injury (TBI) and non-TBI diagnoses. We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 360 adults admitted to a neurosurgical ICU (2019-2022) with daily automated pupillometry and detailed sedation records. "Significant deterioration" was defined as a ≥ 2-point decline in Glasgow Coma Scale, new focal deficits, or escalated neurosurgical intervention. The primary analysis used multivariable logistic regression and causal mediation (exposure: NPi; mediator: deep sedation, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale ≤ -3; outcome: deterioration; 5000 bootstrap samples), adjusting for diagnosis, admission GCS, hypertension, sedation agent and dose. A secondary stratified analysis compared TBI versus non-TBI. Of 360 patients, 80 (22.2%) deteriorated. Lower NPi and greater sedation intensity were independently associated with deterioration (per 1-point higher NPi: adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91; deep sedation: adjusted OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.75-5.73). Higher admission GCS was protective (adjusted OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.95). Mediation analysis showed that sedation depth accounted for 19.6% of the total effect of lower NPi on deterioration (indirect effect β = 0.196; P < .01). In the secondary analysis, mediation was not significant for the TBI deterioration pathway (β = 0.08; P = .10), consistent with the dominant influence of structural injury severity in TBI. Lower pupillary reactivity is strongly associated with neurological deterioration, and this association is partly mediated by sedation depth. Clinically, trending NPi and individualizing sedation, especially when NPi is < 3.0 or declining may help mitigate secondary injury. In TBI, mediation by sedation depth was not evident, suggesting structural injury severity remains the principal determinant of decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.