Observational studyMedicine2025
The severity of placental abruption and its dual impact on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurocysticercosis mimicking eclampsia in a pregnant woman with a history of preeclampsia: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore neonatal and maternal outcomes according to the percentage of placental abruption. The study included 136 pregnant women who gave birth between January 2015 and December 2016 and were diagnosed with placental abruption. Obstetric history was recorded, and neonatal and maternal outcomes were analyzed. It was noted whether an additional operation or intervention was required during the operation. The pregnant women included in the study were divided into 3 groups according to the percentage of placental abruption. 0% to 30% abruption was classified as Group 1, 31% to 50% abruption was classified as Group 2, and 51% to 100% abruption was classified as Group 3. It was found that stillbirth rates were statistically significantly higher in the group 3 patients. 1st minute and 5th minute Apgar scores were found to be significantly lower in groups 2 and 3 compared to group 1. Additional surgical interventions performed during the operation (such as hysterectomy, B-Lynch suture, and Hayman suture) were more common in group 3. When the abruption area of the placenta exceeds 30%, neonatal outcomes are adversely affected, and when it exceeds 50%, fetal mortality rates increase significantly. As the severity of placental abruption increases, the probability of needing further surgical intervention also increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.