Observational studyMedicine2025
Objective motor function assessment using diffusion tensor tractography in subacute acquired brain injury: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corticospinal tract (CST) integrity is a key determinant of motor recovery after focal brain injury. Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) can quantify CST microstructural integrity, but clinically applicable thresholds predicting tract integrity to motor function remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether DTT-derived CST fiber number (FN) and fractional anisotropy (FA) ratios (affected/unaffected, A/U) can serve as objective indicators of motor function in patients with subacute focal acquired brain injury, and to determine optimal cutoff values for these metrics. We retrospectively analyzed 70 patients (7-90 days post-onset) with first-ever unilateral hemiparesis due to ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, hypoxic brain injury, or brain tumor. Motor function was assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, hand function tests (HFTs), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI). CST FN and FA values were measured on both sides, and ratios (A/U) were calculated. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared affected versus unaffected sides. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) identified optimal CST ratio cutoffs associated with neurophysiologic and functional milestones. The CST FN and FA values were significantly reduced on the affected side (all P < .001). Higher FN and FA ratios (A/U) correlated with larger motor-evoked potential amplitudes, higher MRC grades, higher HFT scores, and better MBI outcomes. ROC analysis yielded clinically applicable cutoff values that increased with task difficulty. DTT-derived CST FN and FA ratios (A/U) provide quantitative, objective indicators of motor function in subacute focal brain injury. These tract-based metrics may assist in clinical decision-making and rehabilitation planning by offering reproducible thresholds linked to functional performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.