Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41465848›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Branching Process: A General Conceptual Framework for Addressing Current Ecological and Evolutionary Questions.

Xuhua Xia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xuhua XiaDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 9A7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3092-7566

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2024-05641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical branching-process theory, developed by Galton and Watson in the nineteenth century and later refined by Fisher and Haldane, provides the formal framework for quantifying the fate of new mutants, new viral and bacterial pathogens, new colonization of invasive species, etc. It is a powerful tool to quantify and predict the effect of differential reproductive success on the speciation potential of evolutionary lineages. Here, I revisit the conceptual framework of the branching process, detail its mathematical development over time, tie up a few historical loose strings, illustrate the calculation of the exact extinction probability for the Poisson-distributed reproductive success with the Lambert function (which is often missing in the ecological and evolutionary literature), and highlight the potential applications of the branching process in modern ecology and evolutionary biology, especially in deriving the extinction probability and extinction time. I also highlight a few misconceptions about human demography in the US that can be readily dismissed by applying probability tools such as branching processes.

Indexed as

demographyevolutionextinction probabilityextinction timefixation timeGalton-Watson processoffspring distributionrandom process

Identifiers

PMID41465848
PMCPMC12734302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.